Bye Bye YDL

[Liam Dobczinski]

The player Ydl is banned again.
Lets see how long, maybe one day or one week.

*JokerJoker*

 

[Husam]

The player Ydl is banned again.
Lets see how long, maybe one day or one week.

*JokerJoker*

This is good before the next week reset this give a chance for some alliance groups to be in top 10.
Aj change his game name from a week or more to Ban YDL

 

[Liam Dobczinski]

This is good before the next week reset this give a chance for some alliance groups to be in top 10.
Aj change his game name from a week or more to Ban YDL

Yeah i saw that too.

 

[RicoB92]

Finally this happened!

 

[Liam Dobczinski]

Finally this happened!

Not the first time. Haha

 

[RicoB92]

Not the first time. Haha

Let's hope this one is permanently.

 

[Liam Dobczinski]

Let's hope this one is permanently.

Hope so.

 

[A Merryflyer]

I find cheaters extremely annoying. But I also find it interesting how many people openly cheat on here (if you define cheating as breaking GI's Terms & Conditions), view that cheating as perfectly reasonable, and at the same time berate GI for not enforcing rules.

There is obviously a scale of moral acceptance to cheating.

 

[RicoB92]

I find cheaters extremely annoying. But I also find it interesting how many people openly cheat on here (if you define cheating as breaking GI's Terms & Conditions), view that cheating as perfectly reasonable, and at the same time berate GI for not enforcing rules.

There is obviously a scale of moral acceptance to cheating.

Sure a point though. Just remember the old bug with launching and not using all the stuff you kicked in.. Or the bug last year that gi gave aircraft to people which they never had before, I'm sure everyone still have those planes.. But on the other hand, isn't that a thin line..? I mean, gi themselves neither did a thing to take those planes back..

 

[Arggers]

I find cheaters extremely annoying. But I also find it interesting how many people openly cheat on here (if you define cheating as breaking GI's Terms & Conditions), view that cheating as perfectly reasonable, and at the same time berate GI for not enforcing rules.

There is obviously a scale of moral acceptance to cheating.

I'm cheerily confident that I won't be doing anything that qualifies, but please could you define "openly cheat"ing?

Happy to stand from a position of 100% clean.

 

[A Merryflyer]

Sure a point though. Just remember the old bug with launching and not using all the stuff you kicked in.. Or the bug last year that gi gave aircraft to people which they never had before, I'm sure everyone still have those planes.. But on the other hand, isn't that a thin line..? I mean, gi themselves neither did a thing to take those planes back..

I wasn't referring to bugs, I really don't see how that can be cheating. I was referring to breaking GI's terms & conditions as a definition of cheating.

 

[A Merryflyer]

I'm cheerily confident that I won't be doing anything that qualifies, but please could you define "openly cheat"ing?

Happy to stand from a position of 100% clean.

I think a reasonable definition of "cheating" is breaking GI's terms and conditions. I think "openly" is anyone on here who routinely talks about having multiple accounts on a single device, as an example:

But I deliberately didn't name anyone. Just simply pointing out some hypocrisy.

 

[KingJJ]

I think a reasonable definition of "cheating" is breaking GI's terms and conditions. I think "openly" is anyone on here who routinely talks about having multiple accounts on a single device, as an example:

View attachment 16252

But I deliberately didn't name anyone. Just simply pointing out some hypocrisy.

Hmmm I've never bothered to even look at the terms and conditions!!
So, if I use multiple devices for multiple accounts, am I safe?

 

[A Merryflyer]

Hmmm I've never bothered to even look at the terms and conditions!!
So, if I use multiple devices for multiple accounts, am I safe?

I don't think its a case of being "safe", clearly GI have no intention of enforcing the 'rule', why would they, what harm is it doing? To think they would enforce it is about as fanciful as thinking GI will take action against fuel rings (which are not against the T&C's as far as I can tell).

But yes, if you have twenty devices and you want an account on each that is within the T&C's and is therefore not cheating, using what I think is a fair definition (adhering to the T&C's).

 

[david smith]

I hope ydl gets baned, not holding my breath

 

[Mate]

yeah finaly they ban him
so i hope now he dont come back soon!
now the rankings will be fine and other alliance can use 1
this will be funy next weeks in ac

 

[Kevin1010]

Thats just one. More to go.. but its a start

 

[AJ]

I still don't think it will be fair, There are still those stupids who will just resort to cheating when competition gets tough or they will think opponent is cheating. Ydl was the main player doing this but she's not the only one, Few other's still remain.
Thank you GI for listening.

 

[crescent moon (RIP)]

YDL will be back. I'm sure she has a number of cloned games, just waiting.

 

[Marve]

Something curious happening.
See who is #3 in lunar mission --> M power a second account of ydl
Visit M power and check what alliance he's in --> JOKERJOKER
Check who is member of this alliance --> only ydl

@Mate @Liam Dobczinski Any comment?